Cases 31 - 40 of 361
Nealson v. Blankenship, et al
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
T. Norvell, C.A. Dye, Lt. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norvell v. DePuy Orthopaedics Company, Inc.
as 1:2022dp20041
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Norvell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crump v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2022cv03207
Petitioner:
Norvell Crump
Defendant:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Broadstone Security LLC, et al
as 1:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Reginald Norvell Robinson
Defendant:
Broadstone Security LLC doing business as Nova Armory, Shawn G. Poulin and Ofc. M. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Andrew
as 22-60562
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Norvel Andrew
Turner v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
as 3:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
Norvell Turner, Jr.
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv05624
Plaintiff:
Norvell Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America, Andrew Ciolli, Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
