Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Robinson v. Clarke
as 1:2013cv00371
Petitioner:
Richard E. Robinson
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bryanton et al v. Johnson
as 2:2012cv14114
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryanton , Glenn Rehahn , Cheryl Merrill and others
Defendant:
Ruth Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Bradley v. Abram
as 12-2316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Mrs. Corey Spruill, Terrance Copper and others
Robinson v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00858
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Robinson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Robinson et al v. American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00094
Defendant:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Richard Lowell Robinson and Christine Robinson
Counter_claimant:
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Christine Robinson and Richard Lowell Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. White et al
as 5:2011cv05157
Plaintiff:
Richard Darnell Robinson
Defendant:
Gary Mussell White, Sumner, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
