Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Honeycutt v. Ray et al
as 3:2010cv00890
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. Honeycutt
Defendant:
Gayle Ray, Ricky Bell, Joel Radar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cade et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02494
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Cade , Fannie Grimes-Ferrand , Keith Jones and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SIMMONS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91323
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SIMMONS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC., KEENE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
James v. Simmons et al
as 2:2009cv00438
Plaintiff:
Henry James
Defendant:
Richard Simmons, Robert Leonards, Russell Barrios and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wesley Smith, III v. Pepsi Bottling Group
as 08-1959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III
Defendant - Appellee:
PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, LYNN HOLLY, JOHN T. CAHILL and others
Simmons et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 2:2008cv02448
Plaintiff:
Cindy Y. Simmons and Richard Simmons
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smith v. Pepsi Bottling Group et al
as 2:2008cv02281
Plaintiff:
Wesley Edward Smith, III
Defendant:
Pepsi Bottling Group, Lynn Holly, John T Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poulin et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2008cv11017
Plaintiff:
Thomas Poulin and Tiffany Poulin
Defendant:
Mark Thomas, Anne Champagne, Gary Lattime and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DUNLAP et al v. FISHER PRICE, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00766
Plaintiff:
SUSAN H. DUNLAP and DANIEL D. DUNLAP, SR.
Defendant:
FISHER PRICE, INC., CELEBRITIES PLUS, INC. and RICHARD SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
