Cases 31 - 40 of 457
Tallent v. Oak Ridge Methodist Medical Center et al
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Nancy Abbie Tallent
Defendant:
Oak Ridge Methodist Medical Center, Beth Seaton, Anna Chamble and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Seaton v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2022cv02195
Plaintiff:
Lena Seaton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Seaton v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv08446
Plaintiff:
Paige Seaton
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Pitts v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 22-16599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
NOLAN ESPINDA, FRANCIS SEQUIERA, CAESAR ALTERIS, AKA Caesar Altaris and others
Seaton v. Safety-Kleen Systems Inc
as 3:2022cv02235
Plaintiff:
Dildra Seaton
Defendant:
Safety-Kleen Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Seaton v. K. Dew Realty Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv08192
Plaintiff:
Kevin Seaton
Defendant:
K. Dew Realty Corp. and Eric Chan
SEATON v. MISTER P EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SEATON
Defendant:
MISTER P EXPRESS, INC. and JOSEPH J. METTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Harmon v. Helms et al
as 2:2022cv04129
Plaintiff:
Dennis Harmon
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Bryce Easley, Nevin Seaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02849
Petitioner:
Larry Author Mills
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Defendant:
Moises Villalobos and Keauna Seaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
