Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 360
Tyrone Strother v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 23-1439
Petitioner / Appellant: Tyrone Michael Strother
Respondent / Appellee: State of Minnesota, Tracy Beltz, Warden, MCF - Faribault, Keith M. Ellison, Minnesota Attorney General and others
Reginald StrotherIn re: Reginald Strother
as 23-40142
Petitioner: In re: Reginald Stanly Strother
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Strother v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff: Stephanie A Strother
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Reginald StrotherIn re: Reginald Strother
as 23-40075
Petitioner: In re: Reginald Stanly Strother
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00062
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STROTHER et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2022cv07183
Plaintiff: MARY STROTHER and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED
Defendant: ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Strothers v. John Doe et al
as 9:2022cv01177
Plaintiff: Joseph Strothers
Defendant: John Doe and John Doe, Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reginald StrotherIn re: Reginald Strother
as 22-40737
Petitioner: In re: Reginald Stanly Strother
Strothers v. John Doe et al
as 1:2022cv09344
Plaintiff: Joseph Strothers
Defendant: John Doe and John Doe, Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?