Cases 31 - 40 of 360
Medel v. Carder, et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
Edwin Medel
Defendant:
Been Carder, FNU Bullis, David Cothron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brand v. Suttle et al
as 5:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Marlin Brand
Defendant:
Rodney Suttle and Team Drive-Away, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suttles et al v. Ohio Automobile Club et al
as 2:2021cv05018
Plaintiff:
Brenda Suttles and Robert Suttles
Defendant:
Ohio Automobile Club and Ohio Automobile Club Health Care Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Colvin v. Centurion et al
as 4:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Anthony Machias Colvin
Defendant:
Centurion, S Suttle, Michael Vlatchos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv15657
Plaintiff:
LAURA SUTTLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone v. Morgan County et al
as 3:2021cv03183
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Stone
Defendant:
Morgan County, Mike Carmody, Derek Suttles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37927
Plaintiff:
VICTOR J SUTTLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suttles v. City of Buffalo et al
as 1:2021cv00897
Plaintiff:
Quentin Suttles
Defendant:
City of Buffalo, Buffalo Police Deparment, Ronald Ammerman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nash et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv13447
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Nash, DIANE SAVAGE, ELIZABETH SAWYER and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
