Cases 31 - 40 of 686
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ricks v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Wesley Sinclair Ricks
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Dept of State, Louisiana Notary Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs v. Schnell
as 2:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Shyanne Tubbs
Defendant:
Asia Leech, Mark Sanders, Peter O Bockhorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20684
Plaintiff:
JOLENE TUBB
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tubbs v. H. O. T. Express Inc.
as 7:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Freddie Tubbs
Defendant:
H. O. T. Express Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tubbs v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Paul Tubbs
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, R Russo and Police Officer Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCQUEEN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00504
Petitioner:
ARTHUR ALEXANDER MCQUEEN, JR. and TUBB
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arnold v. US
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, SUSAN BOLEK, H. DRAKE GEBHARD and others
Plaintiff:
B&D FARMS, INC., H. KENT EUHUS LIVING TRUST, DIANA EUHUS LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Vasold v. Walmart Supercenter et al
as 4:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lee Vasold, Jr.
Defendant:
Walmart Supercenter, Texarkana Police Department, Olver A. Osvaldo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
