Cases 41 - 50 of 4,929
Medrano v. Paragon Professional Services, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Medrano
Defendant:
Paragon Professional Services, LLC and Asset Protection and Security Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Kelvin Harris v. USA
as 24-10991
Petitioner:
KELVIN LORENZO HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lorenzo Cole v. Governor of Florida, et al
as 24-11188
Plaintiff:
LORENZO COLE
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, SHERIFF, CITY OF JACKSONVILLE and others
Lorenzo Harris-Thompson v. United States
as 24-1995
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris-Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Freeman v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Autumn Freeman
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Mike Faust, Abraham Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ramon Alvarez v. City of Santa Ana et al
as 8:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Department, The County of Orange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coronel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Coronel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. Samuels et al
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
steven jackson
Defendant:
lorenzo samuels, Shelton Price, The Cornelius Project, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
