Cases 41 - 50 of 2,284
Battle v. Matthews Nissan of Paris
as 4:2024cv00527
Defendant:
Matthews Nissan of Paris
Plaintiff:
James Ray Battle, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Battle v. Hood
as 1:2024cv04622
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Defendant:
Michael James Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Battle v. Panarese
as 1:2024cv04597
Defendant:
Donald Panarese
Plaintiff:
Toy Thomas Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
David Anthony Battle v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv01190
Petitioner:
David Anthony Battle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Battle v. Kinchen
as 3:2024cv00298
Defendant:
Stanley Kinchen
Plaintiff:
Shanika Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Luginbyhl v. Moore, et al
as 24-6102
Defendant:
SGT GELISPIE, R. BYRD, Warden, JUDGE PHILLIP C. CORLEY and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI LUGINBYHL
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Defendant:
SARGEANT TUKES, OFFICER EVONNE MARIE FOYE, OFFICER RAPUNZEL TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El
as 24-1457
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR MISKIMON, SADE BATTLE and DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT CENTRAL VIRGINIA DISTRICT OFFICE
Defendant:
NASIEM AHMAD SHABAZZ EL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alloway, James Richard Allen, Charles Anderson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
