Cases 41 - 50 of 909
Casey v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv00950
Petitioner:
Brian D Casey, Sr
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08275
Plaintiff:
Brian D Lewis
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linda Nash v. Fifth District Court of Appeals of Florida, et al
as 23-12320
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA A. NASH
Defendant / Appellee:
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS OF FLORIDA, RICHARD B. ORFINGER, WENDY W. BERGER and others
Knight v. USA
as 2:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Brian D Knight
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr. v. Brian D. Phillips
as 5:2023cv01199
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Reyes et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Tony C. Curry
Defendant:
Ricky J. Reyes, Quaja Goodman, James Montford Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Poslof, Sr. v. Phillips
as 1:2023cv00909
Petitioner:
Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Gibson
as 4:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Brian D. Bradley
Respondent:
Justin Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prigg v. Shellenberger et al
as 1:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Darius Lamont Prigg
Defendant:
Scott D. Shellenberger, Brian D. Botts and Det. J. Gensel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
