Cases 41 - 50 of 612
Hale v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Hale
Defendant:
Sheriff James Hale and Oconee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Barteaux
as 4:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Respondent:
Cherokee Nation
Defendant:
T Luke Barteaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
In re: Mitchell
as 23-7052
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
JASON CHENNAULT, Sheriff, Cherokee County and SARA HILL, Cherokee Nation Attorney General
Morgan et al v. Constellation Network, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv08869
Plaintiff:
Bradley Morgan, Jesse Smithnosky, Vincent Lam and others
Defendant:
Constellation Network, Inc., Benjamin Jorgensen, Wyatt Meldman-Floch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Miles v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Miles
Defendant:
Williamson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Golaszewski et al
as 3:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee
Defendant:
Richard Golaszewski and Stephen Swentzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Beckley v. Hooper
as 23-30268
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Beckley
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Murphy et al v. Thompson et al
as 0:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Murphy and Rosemarie Murphy
Defendant:
Patricia Linda Thompson and Margaret Malotte Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Pledger v. Herbert et al
as 6:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Pledger
Defendant:
Taylor Herbert and Public Defenders of Lane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cincoski v. Weatherington
as 2:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cincoski
Defendant:
Dr. Weatherington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
