Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Manning v. Harper et al
as 2:2011cv14149
Plaintiff:
George Manning
Defendant:
David Harper, Larry Schack , Dan Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogero v. United States Government et al
as 2:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Patricia Joyce Rogero
Defendant:
United States Government, Ellijay Gilmer County Water and Sewer Authority, City of Ellijay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010at00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Waltman et al v. Broussard et al
as 1:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
David E Waltman , Fanzee Marie Harper and David Harper
Defendant:
Diana Broussard and Ace Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Harper v. Deere and Company
as 6:2009cv03409
Plaintiff:
David Harper
Defendant:
Deere and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harper et al v. Carmichael Equipment, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01122
Plaintiff:
Carl David Harper, Carl David Harper, Jana Harper and others
Defendant:
Carmichael Equipment, Inc., Deere & Company, Deere & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Harper v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77867
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
David Harper
HARPER v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77867
Plaintiff:
DAVID HARPER and DAVID HARPER
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Kurita v. State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The et al
as 3:2008cv00948
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita and others
Defendant:
State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The, Paula Combs, Larry Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
