Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 20,597
Hackborn (PS) v. Stine
as 1:2024cv01514
Plaintiff: Dean D. Hackborn, Dean D Hackborn and Dean Hackborn
Defendant: Stine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. USA
as 1:2024cv01035
Petitioner: Eddie Dean McBride
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff: Stacey Pynn
Defendant: Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osmar v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv01268
Petitioner: Clifford Dean Osmar, Jr
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Gibson v. Gray
as 24-1510
Petitioner: DARIUS GIBSON
Respondent: DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correctional Center
Stamps v. Univ of Texas System
as 24-50405
Plaintiff: Jack Wilson Stamps, Jr.
Defendant: University of Texas System, University of Texas at Austin, Doreen Lorenzo, Assistant Dean of the College of Fine Arts and Director of the School of Design and Creative Technologies, in her individual and official capacities and others
Butler v. Batchelor
as 4:2024cv04053
Plaintiff: Dean Butler doing business as Hope Physical Therapy Center
Defendant: Wade Batchelor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rodgers v. Keefe Commissary Network
as 3:2024cv03087
Plaintiff: Michael Dean Rodgers
Defendant: Keefe Commissary Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Diaz et al
as 5:2024cv03082
Plaintiff: Francisco Ortiz
Defendant: Ralph Diaz, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02760
Plaintiff: Robbie Dean Larson
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?