Cases 41 - 50 of 53,531
Johnathan Fuller v. Donald Mobley
as 24-6587
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A. FULLER
Defendant:
DONALD MOBLEY, AMY LAFLUER and MICHAEL ZINC
Brown v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2024cv11078
Plaintiff:
Donald L Brown
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., Marquee Holdings, Inc. and AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01522
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. JPMorgan Chase & Company
as 1:2024cv11571
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Cartwright et al v. Steele et al
as 6:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Chris Cartwright, Donald Ebeling, Jr., Cinde Ebeling and others
Defendant:
Brandon T. Steele, Steele West Texas Capital Corporation, Steele Bancshares, Inc. and others
Trustee:
Diane Carter, Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Steele West Texas Capital Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Purcell #319445 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01455
Petitioner:
Donald Wade Purcell
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vaughn et al v. Jack L. Marcus Inc
as 1:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Donald D Vaughn, Paul Martin and Charles Tucker
Defendant:
Jack L. Marcus Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ippolito et al v. Douglas County Jail
as 6:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
David Alen Ippolito, Donald James Hoke and David Allyn Brown
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Redemption of Donald Andrew
as 1:2024cv04992
Not Yet Classified:
The Redemption of Donald Andrew
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
