Cases 41 - 50 of 1,974
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Beal v. Greenman et al
as 4:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Camarion Beal
Defendant:
Andrew Greenman, Sam Dotson, Gregory Klipsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacorey King
Defendant:
Warden Rose, Officer McCrainey, Unknown Transportation Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuron Barksdale v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6289
Petitioner:
SHURON MAURICE BARKSDALE
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Department of Corrections
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Shaw v. Dewey et al
as 2:2024cv02197
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Shaw
Defendant:
Robin Dewey, Makayla Powell, Toriance White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Dotson et al v. CG Roxane LLC
as 2:2024cv02567
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Tom M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC and CG Roxane LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dotson et al v. CG Roxanne, LLC
as 2:2024cv02521
Plaintiff:
Michael Dotson, Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon
Defendant:
CG Roxanne, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Randolph Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6280
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of D.O.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
