Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Kenneth Whitmore v. Jonathan Ard
as 12-7999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH WHITMORE
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN ARD, JAMES L. GOLDSMITH, JR., MITCHELL BYRD, JR. and others
Miller v. United States Department of Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2012mc80175
Petitioner:
Edward J. Miller
Respondent:
United States Department of Internal Revenue Service
Jonathan Kohn v. McGuire Woods, et al
as 12-3028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN KOHN, Trustee
Defendant - Appellee:
MCGUIRE WOODS, HAYMOUNT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, HAYMOUNT MEZZ and others
Whitmore v. Ard et al
as 6:2012cv01049
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Whitmore
Defendant:
Jonathan Ard, James L Goldsmith, Jr, Mitchell Byrd, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57301
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49570
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M MILLER
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES
as 2:2011cv48269
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. MILLER
Defendant:
GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
POWELL et al v. FIRST MOUNT VERNON INDUSTRIAL LOAN ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2011cv00695
Plaintiff:
JANICE H. POWELL and GEORGE T. POWELL, JR.
Defendant:
FIRST MOUNT VERNON INDUSTRIAL LOAN ASSOCIATION, ARTHUR G. BENNETT, DALE E. DUNCAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller et al v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Miller, Mark E. Miller, Michael K. Miller and others
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc., Crabbe, Brown and James LLP and Gallagher and Bassett Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
