Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Eric DePaola v. Harold Clarke
as 19-7199
Defendant / Appellee:
D. STILL, in his individual and official capacities, J. T. FLEMING, in his individual and official capacities, J. G. LYALL, in his individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Love v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv00120
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph Love
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia, Jeff Johnson and Sheriff Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Utah, State of
as 2:2018cv00893
Petitioner:
Eric Joseph Davis
Respondent:
Utah, State of
Undetermined:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Labadie v. Bitnar
as 2:2018cv00041
Petitioner:
Eric Joseph Labadie
Respondent:
Michael Bitner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eric DePaola v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, A. DAVID ROBINSON, EARL BARKSDALE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Anderson v. Washington Metro Area Transit Authority
as 1:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Washington Metro Area Transit Authority
as 8:2017cv00322
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph Anderson
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bothne v. Cedar Park Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph Bothne
Defendant:
Cedar Park Police Department, Leander Police Department, Round Rock Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bolcavage v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02377
Plaintiff:
Eric Joseph Bolcavage
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
