Cases 41 - 50 of 123
New Era Cap Co., Inc. v. Moore et al
as 1:2014cv00626
Plaintiff:
New Era Cap Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Ricky F. Moore, Jr. and Nyla Elise Clothing Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Thompson v. Vannoy et al
as 3:2014cv00192
Defendant:
Unknown Babin, Robert Cleveland, Unknown Ellis and others
Notice Only:
William L Kline
Plaintiff:
Tommy W. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay v. Thompson et al(MAG+)
as 2:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Clarence Clay
Defendant:
Myron H. Thompson , Louis V. Franklin , Terry F. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Springer, et al
as 14-5012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LINDSEY K. SPRINGER, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the S.L.C.A. Family Trust
Defendant:
REGINA M. CARLSON, as Co-Trustee of the S.L.C.A. Family Trust, MARTHA F. MOORE, Individually and as Trustee of the W.T. Moore and Martha F. Moore Revocable Trust dated June 12, 2002, JANETH S. SMITH and others
MOORE v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00053
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA F. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Knoxs et al v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv01844
Plaintiff:
Jane D. Knoxs, Cherly Wilson, Bernard Moore and others
Defendant:
Bernice L. Moore and John F. Moore
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04404
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore v. USA
as 5:2013cv01928
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael F Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
