Cases 41 - 50 of 93,442
Harper et al v. G ROCK TRANS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02367
Plaintiff:
Francis Harper, Heather Harper, Michael Blumberg and others
Defendant:
G ROCK TRANS, INC. and Gurpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Blasingham v. Excel Interior Door LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ashley Blasingham
Defendant:
Excel Interior Door LLC and Ronald G Hulse
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Legan et al v. BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Rosie Legan and Tommy G Dotson
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION, BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION SCHOOL BOARD, COLUMBUS NORTH HIGH SCHOOL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
James Harris
Defendant:
Warden Donald Redwood, Deputy Warden Cynthia Davis, Deputy Warden Nicole Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Morrisey et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Defendant:
Patrick Morrisey, Allan L. McVey, John Bernabei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Davis v. First National Bank of Pennsylvania
as 1:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Harold G Davis
Defendant:
First National Bank of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
SUNDAL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
ROBYN G. SUNDAL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Mann v. B&G Pipeline Company
as 1:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Mann, Jr.
Defendant:
B&G Pipeline Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
