Cases 41 - 50 of 454
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pope v. Empire Express Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02369
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Pope
Defendant:
Empire Express Inc. and Timothy Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Gary Gatlin
as 22-4315
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY LYNN GATLIN
Shaun Allen v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 22-2069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaun C. Allen
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas, City of Conway, Reynolds, Magistrate Judge, Conway District Court and others
Oscar v. FCC Coleman II USP et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jean Erole Oscar and ZB
Defendant:
FCC Coleman II USP, FNU Kasmuke, United States of America and others
Respondent:
FNU Wegner and FNU Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
In re: Jason Gatlin
as 22-11415
Petitioner:
In re: JASON GATLIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Walker, Marcellous et al v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Walker, Armin Wand, III, Jeremy Wand and others
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Dane Esser, Wendy Monfils and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Claybon v. Gatlin
as 22-10342
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gregory Allen Claybon
Defendant / Appellee:
Thomas Andrew Gatlin, "Drew", District Attorney and Laura Anne Coats, District Attorney
Ed GatlinIn re: Ed Gatlin
as 22-10977
Petitioner:
In re: ED D. GATLIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Gatlin v. CoreCivic, et al
as 22-2031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON T. GATLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, INC., FKA Corrections Corporation of America and CENTURION CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE OF NEW MEXICO, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
