Cases 41 - 50 of 737
Rodrigues, et al v. Garland
as 23-1776
Petitioner:
WILLIAM REGINALDO RODRIGUES, DEBORA SOARES GOMES RODRIGUEZ and W.J.S.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gomes v. Brown University
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Gomes
Defendant:
Brown University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Robert Gomes v. Yakima Police Department
as 23-35426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LARAMIE GOMES
Defendant / Appellee:
YAKIMA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on denials of applications for naturalization
Fernanda Gomes Da Silva v. City of Costa Mesa et al
as 8:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Fernanda Gomes Da Silva
Defendant:
City of Costa Mesa, Daniel Bruno, Chasen Gaunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Gomes v. Allstate Insurance
as 2:2023cv02212
Plaintiff:
Nicole Gomes
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance and Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Gomes v. Yakima County Jail
as 1:2023cv03071
Plaintiff:
Robert Laramie Gomes
Defendant:
Yakima County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Cantave v. Gomes et al
as 1:2023cv10883
Plaintiff:
Nakia Cantave
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Sylvia Gomes, Jessire Pena, Patrisha Toxey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
