Cases 41 - 50 of 1,717
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hurley v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hurley
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Love v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Rodney Love
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne, Clayton Stephenson, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Holmes v. Chen et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Kiara Holmes
Defendant:
Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, Jawed Karim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hurley v. McDonough
as 24-1387
Claimant:
ANNETTE HURLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01743
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hurley v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv06091
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hurley and Ricky
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
