Cases 41 - 50 of 2,864
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Irvine, et al. v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
as 24-1984
Respondent:
ALEXANDER IRVINE and BARBARA TWADDELL
Petitioner:
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER
International Fidelity Insurance Company et al v. TA Partners, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
International Fidelity Insurance Company and Harco National Insurance Company
Defendant:
TA Partners, LLC, Johnny Lu, 18831 Von Karman Irvine, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Begay v. USA
as 3:2024cv08024
Petitioner:
Randly Irvin Begay and Randly Begay
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 0:2024cv60145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Irvine
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Myles
Defendant:
Jasmyne Irvine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IRVINE-TSCHUOR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
ROBIN IRVINE-TSCHUOR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
