Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
WIMBERLEY v. JONES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00166
Plaintiff: MARGARETRETO WIMBERLEY
Defendant: ROY JONES, JR, ROY JONES, SR, MICHAEL JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv01554
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Jackson v. O'Brien
as 3:2012cv00168
Defendant: Marilyn O'Brien
Plaintiff: Janet Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wimberley v. JONES et al
as 4:2012cv00046
Plaintiff: MARGARETRETO WIMBERLEY
Defendant: ROY JONES, JR, ROY JONES, SR, MICHAEL JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Echols v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00277
Plaintiff: D C Echols
Defendant: State of Alabama, H. Randall Thomas, Charles Graddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC
as 2:2010cv10766
Plaintiff: Janet Jackson
Defendant: Speedway SuperAmerica, LLC
Jonathan Riches v. Jermaine Dupri
as 08-7360
Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Plaintiff: JOHN SINGLETON and ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee: JERMAINE DUPRI and JANET JACKSON
Riches et al v. Dupri et al
as 1:2008cv00063
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Riches, John Singleton and All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant: Jermaine Dupri and Janet Jackson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caston et al v. U. S. President et al
as 2:2007cv00635
Plaintiff: Charles Caston, I.R.S., Seamless and others
Defendant: U. S. President, Senate, Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?