Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
In re: Tormu Prall, et al
as 11-3640
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent: JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Moes v. Woodward et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00912
Plaintiff: Robert John Moes
Defendant: John Woodward and Grand Rapids, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prall v. Cococcia
as 11-2162
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tormu E. Prall
Defendant - Appellee: Susan Cococcia, Mary E. Ahern, Judith E. Wildfeuer and others
Prall v. Cococcia et al
as 3:2011cv00393
Plaintiff: Tormu E. Prall
Defendant: Susan Cococcia, Mary E. Ahern, Judith M. Wildfeuer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barclay v. State of New York
as 10-5067
Plaintiff - Appellant: H. Patrick Barclay
Defendant - Appellee: State of New York, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner, Poland, Officer and others
CRUMP v. DOE et al
as 2:2010cv02331
Plaintiff: RAFEK CRUMP
Defendant: JOHN DOE, JOHN FOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Tormu E. Prall
as 10-1572
Petitioner: In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent: CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT, CITY OF BOSTON, JOHN DOES, a/k/a Unknown Named Boston Police Officers and others
JENKINS v. COUNTY OFFICER HICKS et al
as 1:2010cv01849
Plaintiff: BERNARD JENKINS, JR.
Defendant: COUNTY OFFICER HICKS, CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COUNTY OFFICERS JOHN DOES 1-8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRALL v. BOCCHINI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01228
Plaintiff: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant: CHARLES ELLIS, PHYLLIS OLIVER, MICHELLE R. RICCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prall v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2010cv10058
Plaintiff: Tormu E. Prall
Defendant: City of Boston, John Does 1-99, John Moe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?