Cases 41 - 50 of 183
Olavarria v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2017cv00590
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Olavarria
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, Barbara Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martin v. Thomas et al
as 8:2018cv00937
Plaintiff:
Mark Martin
Defendant:
Michael Thomas, Rayeman Elements, Inc. and Nationwide 5, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Larry v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2018cv00116
Plaintiff:
Julius J Larry, III
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Asa Hutchinson , Leslie Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Louis Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Mark Martin, Gage Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tyrowone Kimble
Defendant:
Coffeeville Police Dept., Grant Gammill , Mark Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triplett v. Ash et al
as 9:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
Omar Triplett
Defendant:
Chad Ash, Mark Martin, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAVERGNE et al v. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES et al
as 1:2017cv00793
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTIN LAVERGNE, FREDERICK JOHN LAVERGNE, LEONARD P. MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, PAUL RYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Martin v. Thomas et al
as 4:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Mark Martin
Defendant:
Michael Thomas , Rayeman Elements, Inc. and Nationwide 5, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
