Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,812
Sabo v. McHenry County et al
as 3:2024cv50164
Plaintiff: Todd Sabo
Defendant: McHenry County, Robb Tadelman, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glynndeavin Von Fox v. Sergeant Raymond Odell et al
as 2:2024cv03590
Plaintiff: Glynndeavin Von Fox
Defendant: Sergeant Raymond Odell and Police Officer Neil Sneath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson et al v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Peter Thompson and Cattail Creek Subdivision-Phase II
Defendant: State of Montana, City of Bozeman, Cattail Creek Community Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Amy E. Freilich et al v. Catherine MacLeod Harnish et al
as 2:2024cv03514
Petitioner: Amy Freilich, Neil Popowitz and Atty Nathaniel K MacPherson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jomo Barnett v. Joseph Schember, et al
as 24-1801
Plaintiff: JOMO BARNETT
Defendant: JOSEPH SCHEMBER, Mayor, DAN SPIZABNEY, Chief of Police, ELIZABETH A. HIRZ, Head of D.A. Office and others
Ruotolo v. Town of New Paltz
as 24-1109
Plaintiff: ANGELO RUOTOLO
Defendant: Sherrif JUAN FIGUEROA, JOHN DOE, ULSTER COUNTY and others
US v. Bronson
as 24-1363
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: JOSEPH NEIL BRONSON, JR.
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff: Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant: City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloane v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65288
Plaintiff: Neil Sloane
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Nathaniel Josey
as 24-6358
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NATHANIEL JOSEY, a/k/a Neil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?