Cases 41 - 50 of 51
United States of America v. $2,045.00 in U.S. Currency et al
as 5:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$2,045.00 in U.S. Currency and 1979 Chevrolet Camaro Rally Sport
Claimant:
Luman Paro
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Boyd v. Board of Pardons & Paroes et al
as 1:2010cv00911
Respondent:
Board of Pardons & Paroes, T. J. Scroggins and Director Rick Thaler
Petitioner:
Burns Tilton Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooklynne Broadbent et al v. Internet Direct Response, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06508
Defendant:
Thomas D. Blasio, M.D., Sherry Bresnahan, D.C., Tom Broderick and others
Plaintiff:
Brooklynne Broadbent and Richard Money
Paro v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv30119
Plaintiff:
Robert M Paro , Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Romo v. Paros et al
as 1:2010cv02347
Plaintiff:
Arturo Romo
Defendant:
Jim Paros and Ajax Uniform Rental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Henry et al v. Waste Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00410
Defendant:
Waste Management, Inc. and Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry, Jaron Paima, Frederick Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bloomer et al v. Becker College
as 1:2009cv11342
Plaintiff:
Beth Bloomer and Edmund Paro
Defendant:
Becker College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Bloomer v. Becker College et al
as 4:2009cv11342
Plaintiff:
Beth Bloomer
Defendant:
Becker College and Edmund Paro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Paro v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv01880
Plaintiff:
Gordon Paro, Gordon Paro and Gordon Paro
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
