Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Jones v. Secretary, Drug Enforcement Agency
as 8:2018cv01985
Defendant:
Secretary, Drug Enforcement Agency
Plaintiff:
Patrick Martin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Potter et al
as 1:2018cv03093
Plaintiff:
Patrick Martin Lee
Defendant:
Ryan Potter , City of Ellensburg , Ellensburg Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Watson et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Defendant:
Watson, Michael H Watson, Elizabeth P. Deavers and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Reverend Regina Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03076
Plaintiff:
Patrick Martin
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patrick Martin v. Johnny Frazier et al
as 2:2017cv03299
Defendant:
Johnny Frazier and Stacie Frazier
Plaintiff:
Patrick Martin
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Smith , Rexford Martin , Ronald Matheny and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Ralph Martin
as 17-11322
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RALPH PATRICK MARTIN
MARTIN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv02954
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MARTIN and MARCHELL NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv03676
Plaintiff:
Patrick Martin
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01432
Plaintiff:
Debra Martin and Patrick Martin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
