Cases 41 - 50 of 216
Parshall v. Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Shannon B. Arvin, Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., Woodford Van Meter and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Washam-Buford v. City of Prichard, Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Defendant:
Officer Jay Wilson and City of Prichard, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Jamaya Washam-Buford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sykes et al v. The Housing Authority of the City of Prichard
as 1:2021cv00198
Defendant:
The Housing Authority of the City of Prichard
Plaintiff:
Yurlean Sykes and Henry Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PRICHARD v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv00493
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PRICHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prichard v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00546
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Prichard
King v. Brummett et al
as 4:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Antwoine King
Defendant:
Charles Prichard and Matthew Brummett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(SS) Prichard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Glenda Prichard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Prichard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021at00058
Plaintiff:
Glenda Prichard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Merritt v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham and Mrs. Prichard
Plaintiff:
Shareef Kalil Merritt and Shareef Khalil Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Reginald McFadden
as 21-2
Respondent:
Thomas Bellein, C-COC-NYS, Carl J. Koenigsmann, Deputy Commissioner; Chief Medical Officer of DOCCS, William Canfield, Medical Director; Southport Correctional Facility and others
Petitioner:
Reginald McFadden, AKA Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
