Cases 41 - 50 of 71
CoStar Realty Information, Inc. v. Insite Commercial Group, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
CoStar Realty Information, Inc.
Defendant:
Insite Commercial Group, LLC and Randall Thomas
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Holloway v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Randall Thomas Holloway
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Edgar Patton v. Phillip Bryant, et al
as 14-60148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR PATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP "PHIL" BRYANT, RANDAL THOMAS, MICHAEL "MIKE" HOWIE and others
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv34025
Plaintiff:
Virgina Renee Randall Thomas and Rob N. Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patton v. Bryant et al
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Edgar Patton
Defendant:
Phillip "Phil" Bryant, Randal Thomas, Michael "Mike" Howie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv15494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gene Pfeifer, et al v. City of Silverton, et al
as 12-36003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE PFEIFER, RONALD PFEIFER, INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SILVERTON, SILVERTON FIRE DISTRICT, DARYL JONES and others
Gene Pfeifer, et al v. City of Silverton, et al
as 12-35895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENE PFEIFER, RONALD PFEIFER, INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SILVERTON, SILVERTON FIRE DISTRICT, DARYL JONES and others
Thomas v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00416
Plaintiff:
Randall Thomas
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Randall McArty v. Ray Hobb
as 11-2569
Petitioner:
Randall Thomas McArty
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director of A.D.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
