Cases 41 - 50 of 55,350
Berger v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Stephen Berger
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stephens et al v. AT&T et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Petitioner:
Raelun Stephens, Sr. and KR&R Appliance
Respondent:
AT&T and Automation Personnel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yang v. Urbahn Architects PLLC
as 1:2024cv04558
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
Urbahn Architects PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Moulton v. Bowne
as 1:2024cv04576
Plaintiff:
Paula A. Moulton
Defendant:
Stephen P. Bowne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ostrander v. Teradata Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Vincent Ostrander
Defendant:
Teradata Corporation, Stephen McMillan and Claire Bramley
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Stephens v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Tina Stephens
Counter Claimant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Arellano et al v. Becton et al
as 3:2024cv02250
Plaintiff:
Stephen Arellano, The Public, Brysen Arellano and others
Defendant:
Diana Becton, Rob Bonta, Mary Ann O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Estes v. Tabor et al
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Shaun Jermaine Estes
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Tabor, Court CLerk Susie Hassett, Prosecutor Daniel Shue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
