Cases 41 - 50 of 725
Swik v. Searcy County Jail
as 3:2022cv03068
Plaintiff:
Joseph Swik
Defendant:
Searcy County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swik v. Searcy County Jail
as 4:2022cv01135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Swik
Defendant:
Searcy County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Searcy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Searcy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7276
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
La Joy Searcy v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv07763
Plaintiff:
La Joy Searcy
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers, LLC a Corporation doing business as Lowes and Does 1 to 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
MCCLENDON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, HEATHER DAVIS, LT KATRINA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Twin Med LLC v. Skyline Healthcare LLC, et al
as 22-2953
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Twin Med LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
Skyline Healthcare LLC, Joseph Schwartz, Searcy Holdings LLC, doing business as Searcy Health and Rehab and others
Defendant:
Pro Procurement Services LLC, Spring Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center LLC and Dierks Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center LLC
Jones et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02488
Plaintiff:
Willie Jones, Ellen D Dotson, Cheryl B Manning and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC, NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
San Miguel v. McLane
as 22-10517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Samuel San Miguel
Defendant / Appellee:
Marsha McLane, Texas Civil Commitment Center, Executive Director, Michael Searcy, Racheal Kingston and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
