Cases 41 - 50 of 155
RICHEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39964
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS SENTELL RICHEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sentell v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00457
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Jackie Sue Sentell
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis v. East Baton Rouge Parish Prison et al
as 3:2019cv00880
Defendant:
Unknown and East Baton Rouge Parish Prison
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Centraarchy Restaurant Mgmt v. Philip Angelo
as 19-1888
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK ODEGARD, DERRICK BELTON, PATRICK THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
JEREMY DOUGLAS NIELSEN, CHELSEA MCCAFFREY COOK, DANIELLE DOWSEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTRAARCHY RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Hawkins v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (INMATE 1)
as 4:2019cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Deputy Sentell, Detective Green, Sgt. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Deputy Sentell, Detective Green, Sgt. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enclade v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01629
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Enclade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monroe v. Andrews
as 5:2018hc02230
Petitioner:
Travis Sentell Monroe
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
D'Amato v. Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv04397
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco, Health and Human Services, San Francisco Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Irina Ioana D'Amato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
