Cases 41 - 50 of 101
AIG Property Casualty Company et al v. Edwards Excavating, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02661
Plaintiff:
AIG Property Casualty Company and Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Edwards Excavating, Inc. , Shaeffer Hyde Construction Company and Eagle River Water & Sanitation District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaeffer et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2015cv14200
Plaintiff:
Gloria Shaeffer and Gary Shaeffer
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Shaeffer Coleman
as 15-14697
Petitioner:
In re: SHAEFFER COLEMAN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
SHAEFFER v. ARKEMA, INC.
as 5:2015cv02593
Plaintiff:
ANN SHAEFFER
Defendant:
ARKEMA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Mardis v. Three John Does of D.R.D.C., et al
as 15-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER S. MARDIS, Propria Persona
Defendant - Appellee:
THREE JOHN DOES OF D.R.D.C., in their individual and official capacities, 1 JOHN DOE INMATE AT D.R.D.C., in his individual capacity, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SCHERBARTH, S.C.F, in their Official Capacity and others
Rivers v. Turner et al
as 3:2014cv02547
Plaintiff:
Doylan V. Rivers
Defendant:
Neil Turner, F.N.U. Hunt, F.N.U. Shaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mardis v. D.R.D.C., et al
as 1:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Alexander Mardis
Defendant:
James Falk, Hoffman, Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Coleco Best v. Travis Spark
as 14-6168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLECO TAYLOR BEST
Defendant - Appellee:
TRAVIS SPARKS, MATT MILLER, CHUCK ARNOLD and others
Robledo v. Davis et al
as 1:2013cv03034
Petitioner:
Craig S. Robledo
Respondent:
J. Davis, B. Shaeffer and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
