Cases 41 - 50 of 214
KERR v. INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00654
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT EQUIPMENT TRANSFER CO., INC. and WILLIAM T. ADAMS
Plaintiff:
TERESA KERR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Chronister et al
as 1:2019cv22033
Defendant:
Chad Chronister and Juan J. Perez
Plaintiff:
Tyron T. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Chronister et al
as 1:2019cv22032
Defendant:
Chad Chronister and Juan J. Perez
Plaintiff:
Tyron T. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01842
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Deshon Adams v. USA
as 19-1742
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DESHON T. ADAMS
Allen v. Lyons & Farrar, P.A. et al
as 2:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Samuel T. Adams, P.A., Douglas S. Lyons, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Bennett, et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 19-15101
Undetermined:
THE ESTATE OF JOSHUA E. WOODY, DECEASED, JESSICA F. LESTER, JOHN E. ADAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL BENNETT, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Marla Ann Bennett and LINDA BENNETT, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Maria Ann Bennett
Defendant:
THE IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Adams v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00104
Petitioner:
Deshon T Adams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kozusko et al v Tire Discounters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Kozusko , David Johnson , Scott A. Mustovich and others
Defendant:
Tire Discounters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
