Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 214
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff: TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant: JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Floyd Adams
as 24-5160
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FLOYD T. ADAMS
PEROZA-BENITEZ v. BRITTAIN et al
as 5:2024cv00654
Petitioner: JOSE PEROZA-BENITEZ
Respondent: KATHY BRITTAIN, JOHN T. ADAMS and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Marroquin et al
as 8:2024cv00017
Defendant: Franklin Jonatan Garcia Marroquin, Franklin Jonathan Garcia, Ashley Ortiz and others
Plaintiff: United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Insurance
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant: THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81519
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as OHS/2:23-CV-02949
Plaintiff: Jeffrey T Adams
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02949
Plaintiff: Jeffrey T Adams
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cummings v. McGinley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff: William Cummings
Defendant: Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 5:2023ct03088
Plaintiff: Emmanuel Antonio Patterson
Defendant: Cristol Adams, Ennis Wright and Major T. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?