Cases 41 - 50 of 27,347
Fortune v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Willie C Fortune
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
WOODS v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WOODS
Defendant:
DANIELLE K JONES and WILLIE R CORFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Weaver v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2024cv01162
Petitioner:
Willie Weaver
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bassett #867835 v. Grover
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Bassett #867835, Jr.
Defendant:
Jarrett Grover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mack v. Barnette et al
as 7:2024cv03401
Plaintiff:
John Willie Mack, Jr
Defendant:
Barry Joe Barnette, John David Burgess and Manuel J. Ortundo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Shannon v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Shannon
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Brian Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Cummings v. Farah & Farah, P.A.
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Cummings
Defendant:
Farah & Farah, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination on Basis of Disability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
