Cases 41 - 50 of 818
Priest v. Wheat Ridge City Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Clinton Priest and Clinton Eugene Priest
Defendant:
Wheat Ridge Police Department, Austin Pittman, Kyle Boesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Said v. Moreno et al
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Islam Yaser-Ab Said
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Moreno, Dr. FNU Wheat, Dr. FNU Winger and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Rayburn Correctional Center et al
as 6:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Rayburn Correctional Center, Travis Day and Karla Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheat v. Porter et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wheat
Defendant:
M Porter, H Wolfe and M Gapski
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEARCY v. VILSACK et al
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
HENRY SEARCY, JR.
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, JUSTIN MAXSON, MISTY GILES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
King v. Dr. Osula et al
as 2:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Dr. Osula and Lt. Wheat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutchins v. Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Barry Hutchins
Defendant:
Arlington County Mental Behavioral Health Dept., Michael T. Baylous, Officer A. Sawyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
