Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Cornelis Moore v. William Duncan, et al
as 10-17646
Petitioner:
CORNELIS GERONE MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUNCAN, Warden and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Ross v. Bowers et al
as 3:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Defendant:
Walter Bowers, Jr. and William Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2009cv00458
Plaintiff:
William Duncan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen, Jr v. Christianson et al
as 1:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
Allen Columbus, Jr
Defendant:
Adam Christianson, Gina Leguria, William Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raul Hernandez v. William Duncan, et al
as 09-15732
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAUL ALVAREZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUNCAN and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Richard Kolacki v. William Duncan, et al
as 09-15027
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD KOLACKI
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUNCAN and C. A. TERHUNE
Duncan v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2008cv01629
Plaintiff:
Charles William Duncan
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Brackner, Linda Chew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
as 2:2008cv04260
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALVIN BROWN, EDWARD A. ABRAHAM, FREDERICK W. BENDER and others
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Rodney Holder v. William Duncan, et al
as 08-55922
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY G. HOLDER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUNCAN, Warden, EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Attorney General and CHRISTOPHER TOTTEN, District Attorney
Shadale Williams v. William Duncan, et al
as 08-16176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHADALE L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUNCAN, Warden, J. ALLISON, Chief Deputy Warden, R. PARIN, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
