Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Collins v. USA
as 3:2016cv00151
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: William Randall Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Burnette v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00365
Plaintiff: William Randall Burnette
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn, Ruth Neglich, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnette v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00352
Plaintiff: William Randall Burnette
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn, Ruth Naglich, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnette v. Jones (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00146
Plaintiff: William Randall Burnette
Defendant: Karla Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Anthony Wayne Credit Adjusters, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00364
Plaintiff: Todd J Green
Defendant: Anthony Wayne Credit Adjusters, Inc. and William Randall Kammeyer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams v. Holt
as 3:2015cv00166
Petitioner: William Randal Adams
Respondent: Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-30894
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00054
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
McKinney v. Williams, et al
as 14-6247
Plaintiff - Appellee: WILLIAM RANDALL MCKINNEY
Defendant - Appellant: PHIL WILLIAMS
Defendant: JEREMY ANGLIN, PAUL CAMACHO and CHRISTOPHER GULIKERS
Cox v. Pohlman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00814
Plaintiff: William Randall Cox
Defendant: Roger Pohlman , Todd Stewart , Stephen Schueler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?