Cases 41 - 50 of 352
Broadfield v. USA
as 22-10519
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brian Broadfield
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, NFN Russell, Doctor, NFN Zook, Warden and others
Zook v. Legenhousen, et al.
as 3:2022cv00510
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zook
Defendant:
Richard Legenhousen and Brian Burdine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NOBLE et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NOBLE, MATTHEW SMITH, JONIE SMITH and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Law, Jr. v. Zook, Warden et al
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anthony Law, Jr.
Defendant:
David Zook, Warden, Robert Whitt and L Butcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Head v. Zook
as 5:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Charles Head
Respondent:
K Zook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Broadfield v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Brian Broadfield
Defendant:
United States of America, NFN Russell, NFN Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Carter v. Correctional Officer Cole
as 22-6417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES KENZELL CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COLE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. POWERS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER M. RUTLEDGE and others
Forbes v. Zook et al
as 3:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Forbes
Defendant:
R Zook, FCI Seagoville, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Barber et al
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
Stacy Barber, Tammy Zook, William Bechtold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
