Cases 41 - 50 of 51,742
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant:
Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples v. McCormick et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
James Peeples
Defendant:
David McCormick and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
First Casa de Marina v. Juanta Clark et al
as 2:2024cv04445
Plaintiff:
First Casa de Marina
Defendant:
Juanta Clark and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rubie's II, LLC v. Ma et al
as 1:2024cv04079
Plaintiff:
Rubie's II, LLC
Defendant:
Xiao Ma doing business as Funflatable doing business as Zpisf, John or Jane Does 1-10 and John Doe Companies 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Marivic Ballesteros v. MTGLQ Investors, LP
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
MARIVIC A. BALLESTEROS
Defendant:
MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP, RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, SN SERVICING CORPORATION and others
Essavi v. City of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-3336
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ESSAVI, Trustee of the Carasso Family Trust
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
James Wright v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wharton v. Benjamin et al
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wharton
Defendant:
Jasoby Benjamin, United States Postal Service, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
