Cases 51 - 60 of 3,695
Lang v. Smith
as 24-10242
Petitioner:
Barbara Lang
Respondent:
Michael Smith, Warden, Federal Medical Center Carswell
Modere et al v. Deloof et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Modere, Inc., Maple Mountain Group, Inc., Modere Inc and others
Defendant:
Amber DeLoof, DeBoss Marketing, Brynn Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JONES LANG LASALLE BROKERAGE, INC. v. LIBERTY 1100 VA DR LLC
as 2:2024cv01175
Plaintiff:
JONES LANG LASALLE BROKERAGE, INC.
Defendant:
LIBERTY 1100 VA DR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Lang et al
as 9:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tayln Lang, Heirloom Remedies and Heirloom Curiosities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Joel Frederick Lang v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Joel Frederick Lang
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWNING v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
PIERRE BROWNING
Defendant:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY and DAVID LANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3038
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
