Cases 51 - 60 of 17,372
In Re: AT&T Date Breach Litigation.
as TXN/3:24-CV-00757
Plaintiff:
Petroski, Alex Petroski, Andrew March and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Jones v. Queen Anne's County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Donald Jones
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Maryland, Warden/Director Lamonte Cooke, Sgt. Daniel Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Bays et al v. Rapid Action, LLC
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Bays, Courtney Bobinger, Cierra Daniels and others
Defendant:
Rapid Action, LLC doing business as RapidStaff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roderick Patterson v. Kerry Forsteal, et al
as 24-1790
Plaintiff:
RODERICK S. PATTERSON
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORSTEAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALLYSON HUMPHREY and others
Patterson v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
as 0:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
Angela Patterson
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Patterson v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06062
Plaintiff:
Ruby J. Patterson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Semper v. Gadsden Land Bank Association et al
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Jehan Semper
Defendant:
Gadsden Land Bank Association, Chamberlain Parker, Rod Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn et al v. County of Washington et al
as NYN/1:24-CV-00327
Plaintiff:
Vaughn, Michael Vaughn, Kevin Green and others
Defendant:
County of Washington and Al Nolette
Ellis v. Wright Patterson AFB
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ellis
Defendant:
Wright Patterson AFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
