Cases 51 - 60 of 4,230
Clincy et al v. Waste Pro of Mississippi, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Willie A. Clincy and Kenny K. Kincaid
Defendant:
Waste Pro of Mississippi, Inc. and Waste Pro USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
James et al v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
Najee James, Kenny Scott, Jeremy Washington and others
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Pontiac Correctional Center and Livingston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abron v. Kartez Carriers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Danuel D. Abron
Defendant:
Kartez Carriers, Inc. and Kenny Cartez Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
USA v. Kenneth Cherry, Jr.
as 24-1213
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KENNETH EUGENE CHERRY, JR., a/k/a Kenny
Gilchrease v. D.R. Horton, Inc.- Gulf Coast et al
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Kenny D Gilchrease, Sr.
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.- Gulf Coast and Lake Shore Village Property Owners Associations Inc.
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Bing et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Richard Kenny Woodson
Defendant:
Christy Bing, Kayla McBride, William R. Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. GARLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Kenny Durham
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, PETER LEARY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Oakley, Inc. et al v. Jiang et al
as 6:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc. and Eye Safety Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenny Jiang and Galaxy Lenses LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
