Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Bunton v. Bollman et al
as 8:2014cv02678
Plaintiff:
Lillian Bunton
Defendant:
Dwight Lynn Bollman and Metzler Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Howell v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 14-2444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. HOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF ILLINOIS, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Bollman v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02268
Plaintiff:
Richard Bollman
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bollman v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv06039
Plaintiff:
Mary Bollman
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Howell v. Department of Human Services of the State of Illinois et al
as 2:2013cv02212
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Department of Human Services of the State of Illinois, State of Illinois, Director of DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Hines et al
as 2:2013cv02211
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Lisa K Hines, Alex O'Brien, James Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Gjuraj (Simms)
as 11-5224
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Isni Gjuraj, Arbnor Gjini, Cookie, Richard Davis, AKA Poo Poo, AKA Shooter, AKA Buck and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Travis Simms, AKA Trav Lo, AKA Love
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
