Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Johnson v. United States Judges
as 1:2014cv11273
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Defendant:
United States Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Emerson Electric Co.
as 4:2013cv01240
Defendant:
Scroll Compressors LLC , Sensata Technologies, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson v. Cain et al
as 2:2013cv00469
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2013cv00032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Latzy
as 1:2012cv00805
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Latzy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv85126
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR. and CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Word et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05937
Plaintiff:
Barbara Word, Barbara Word, Wilesha Butler and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv74201
Plaintiff:
ROMEY CLARENCE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., H.K. PORTER CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
v. Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv05044
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Defendant:
Steven Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
