Cases 51 - 60 of 113
Davis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02099
Plaintiff:
Deborah Davis
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joan Alston, et al v. Pfizer, Inc., et al
as 17-55911
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOAN ALSTON, MYRNA ANDERSON, SHIRLEY AYERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PFIZER, INC.
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES, 1-50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv61142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Joan Alston et al vs Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Joan Alston, Myrna Anderson, Shirley Ayers and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc
CUMMINGS et al v. METZNER et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Defendant:
2565 NORTH 300 EAST, ANDERSON, INDIANA 46012, 809 SOUTH BUCKINGHAM ROAD, YORKTOWN, INDIANA 47396, A 2003 VEHICLE BEARING VIN #1GNDT13X23K159951 and others
Plaintiff:
RODNEY CUMMINGS and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davis v. Capital One Services LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04263
Plaintiff:
Deborah Davis
Defendant:
Capital One Services LLC and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
DAVIS et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01031
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DAVIS and RICKY W.K. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
