Cases 51 - 60 of 222
Candido Angelez Martinez v. William Barr
as 20-1254
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CANDIDO DELOS ANGELEZ MARTINEZ
(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar et al
as 2:2020cv00187
Defendant:
R. Godwin, T. Lee, M. Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin VanFossan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) VanFossan v. Alcantar et al
as 1:2020cv00173
Defendant:
R. Godwin, T. Lee, M. Mercado and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin VanFossan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Perez Soto
as 20-1018
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
VALENTIN DELO PEREZ SOTO, a/k/a Miguel Martinez, a/k/a Miguelin Valentine Sanchez, a/k/a Harold Gutierrez, a/k/a Miguel Angel Sanchez Caraballo
Rebecca Apartments Tenant Association et al v. Harold Weinberg, et al.
as 8:2019cv03315
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apartments Tenant Association, Gholamreza Mohebi, Peter A. Muntjan and others
Defendant:
William "Brad" Morton, Rebecca Limited Partnership, Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Not Afraid et al v. Reyes et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Louise Zokan-Delos Reyes, The United States of America and Jo-Ellen Cree
Plaintiff:
Leroy Not Afraid and Ginger Goes Ahead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Cintron v. Lang et al
as 2:2019cv01249
Defendant:
Atty Michael S Winter, DeLos Santos Law Offices, Jeremy Charles and others
Plaintiff:
Angel L Cintron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DELO et al v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2019cv00951
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE DELO and GREG DELO
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELOE v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2019cv00098
Respondent:
EUGENE A. VITTONE, II and MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JAMES DELOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DELO et al v. MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2019cv02162
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE DELO and GREG DELO
Defendant:
MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
